AhlulBayt News Agency: the full commentary by Lebanese analyst Ismail al‑Najjar on Trump’s true objectives behind the so‑called Gaza Peace Council is as follows:
Trump has declared the establishment of a Board of Peace, claiming that its purpose is to oversee the implementation of a post‑war peace and reconstruction plan for the Gaza Strip. He has invited several governments and leaders to join this Board of Peace, presenting it as a new framework for resolving international conflicts—one that could serve as an alternative to the United Nations and the Security Council.
This raises an essential question: What are Trump’s real goals in creating this Board of Peace?
1. Projecting U.S. Dominance and Personal Leadership
Trump seeks to portray the United States as the central command of international peace missions, positioning himself as the only figure capable of leading such efforts. From his perspective, this board elevates his personal status and grants him a pivotal global role.
2. Expanding Influence in a New Global Order
Leaked documents suggest that Trump envisions the board as an entity far broader than Gaza’s reconstruction—one that could eventually address global conflicts. This indicates an attempt to secure power and influence within a reconfigured world order.
3. A Substitute for the UN and Security Council
Trump may view this board as a replacement for the UN and its Security Council, using it as a tool to reshape the traditional global system according to his own vision.
4. Access to Enormous Financial Resources
Another objective appears to be financial. A draft charter reportedly requires a one‑billion‑dollar fee for permanent membership—an amount that favors wealthy nations while sidelining poorer ones, giving disproportionate influence to whoever leads the board.
5. Crafting the Image of a “Global Peace Leader”
This initiative allows Trump to present himself as a powerful global leader “working for peace,” urging world leaders to follow his lead—even though some of those joining the board are themselves controversial figures.
Mixed International Reactions
Countries such as Egypt, the Israeli regime, and Azerbaijan have reportedly agreed to join the board. Others have rejected the initiative or expressed reservations, arguing that it undermines the UN and carries political motives.
A Challenge to the Existing Global Order
Trump’s move—quickly endorsed by several world leaders—directly challenges the current global system, which grants permanent Security Council membership to Russia, China, and France. Under Trump’s model, the United States would become the sole authority shaping international decisions, including launching wars under the banner of “peace,” while limiting the ability of other major powers to object.
This raises critical questions:
1-Will Russia and China accept such a structure?
2-Will Moscow, in particular, submit to Trump’s demands?
If so, it would effectively surrender its international influence to Trump.
According to al‑Najjar, Trump’s creation of this board marks a blueprint for the end of the United Nations, the Security Council, and their institutions—a dramatic shift that could redefine global governance.
/129
Your Comment